October 10, 2004
Dear Concerned and
Questioning Americans,
I have read and was astounded
and dismayed by “Painful
Questions”, “The
New Pearl Harbor”, and “In Plane
Site”, all about the facts surrounding the 9/11 terrorist attacks. I had
believed the administration’s conspiracy theory that 19 terrorists had attacked
us. I thought that perhaps the military had screwed up royally. I am now convinced
that it is the Bush administration’s “conspiracy theory” that is absurd; that
19 screw-ups, who couldn’t do anything right, somehow defeated the entire
US Air Force, CIA, FBI, NSA, and multiple airport security screenings. This
unbelievable “official” “conspiracy theory” has now been rubber stamped by
the 9/11 Commission Report (http://www.9-11commission.gov)
which, according to Harper’s Magazine (October 2004) and other
investigators, is a “whitewash”, full of errors, lies, and omissions. Senator
Mark Dayton of
I will give free copies to fire stations, police stations, judges, prosecutors, and politicians (email:jwalter@walden3.org).
Call
this number to order the books and videos: 1 (800) 442-3977
Researchers I hired have confirmed the following. You be the judge.
Q
“The WTC was probably one of the more resistant tall buildings….they
just don’t build them as tough as the
Q
“A steel building
survived fires in experiments with extreme temperatures beyond the range
possible with jet fuel.” – Cardington fire tests. www.corusconstruction.com/legacy/fire/images/fireres_section15.pdf
Q
No steel building has ever been destroyed by fire – Fire Engineering
Magazine
Q
“The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to
collapse remain unknown at this time.” Federal Emergency Management
Administration. www.fema.gov/library/wtcstudy.shtm Chapter 5 Page 31 May 2002
Q
The investigation of the WTC “is a half-baked farce.” - Fire Engineering
Magazine. Jan 2002
http://fe.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=OnlineArticles&SubSection=Display&PUBLICATION_ID=25&ARTICLE_ID=131225
Q
All of the important evidence from the disaster was destroyed,
illegally, and before the investigation was even concluded, some before it
began! – Fire Engineering. http://fe.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Display.cfm?Section=OnlineArticles&SubSection=Display&PUBLICATION_ID=25&ARTICLE_ID=131225
; http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/science/hsy77747.000/hsy77747_0f.htm
Q
$600,000 was spent investigating the WTC collapses vs. $40 million on
http://www.house.gov/science/wtc/charter.htm
Q
The
Q
Building 7 at the WTC, 47 floors, steel, and constructed differently
from the twin towers, fell at 5:30 but it was never hit by an airplane, had no
significant fire!
Q
Jet fuel burns at too low a temperature to significantly harm steel. The
black smoke means that the fire did not reach the maximum temperature for jet
fuel.
Q
The fires were not long enough (only 1-2 hours) to harm the steel.
Q
Yet days later, there were “hot spots” in the building that still
exceeded the maximum temperature possible from jet fuel – but not from
explosives. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0405/ofr-01-0405.html
Q
The gusting wind on the towers had at times been greater than the impact
of the airliners. Neither tower was bent nor did they creak or groan at any
time. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/buildingbig/wonder/structure/world_trade.html
http://www.skyscrapersafety.org/html/article_20040619_nyt.html
Q
The buildings collapsed at the maximum speed of gravity – impossible
without explosives! (Each floor hit would have slowed the fall some, more
at the beginning.)
Q
The concrete was encased in a steel framed pan yet clouds of finely pulverized
concrete and steel beams came shooting out of the buildings for up to three
times the width of the building at hundreds of miles per hour - only
possible with explosives.
Q
If the force of the falling building is strong enough to pulverize
concrete then the bolts and rivets would have to hold beyond that force – and
then give way. Yet the force to pulverize concrete into fine powder is greater
than the force that sheers or stretches steel bolts and rivets. It cannot be
both ways.
Q
Both impacts and fires in the
Q
“I’m still to this day amazed that he [alleged pilot on Flight 77] could
have flown into the Pentagon," according to the hijackers pilot
instructor. "He could not fly at all." Yet, “The steep turn was so
smooth, the sources say, it's clear there was no fight for control going on.
And the complex maneuver suggests the hijackers had better flying skills than
many investigators first believed.” http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20A11FD35550C778CDDAC0894DA404482
Q
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES, Public
Hearing, Friday, May 23, 2003: Mr.
Mineta: “There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president,
"The plane [Flight 77] is 50 miles out…. 30 miles…10 miles out” – Cheney
knew this plane was coming at Washington and the Pentagon and yet no planes had
been scrambled to protect Washington after over 1 hour since the WTC was
attacked. Even at 400 miles per hour, it takes over 7 minutes to travel 50
miles, more since the plane was at altitude. Cheney knew the plane was coming
when it was even farther away since Mr. Mineta had not been present when Flight
77 was first reported to Mr. Cheney. They had known this flight was missing for
over an hour after the first plane crashed into the
Q
NORAD successfully intercepted off course and suspected hijackings 67 times during
the year prior to 9/11 (AP, 8/13/02). An Air Force F-15 “scrambles” to 29,000
feet in 2.5 minutes, normally intercepting in 15 minutes. Yet on that morning
they were not one, not two, not three, but four (4) failures -- three (3) after
they knew the planes were high-jacked and intended mass murder. http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/071204_final_fraud.shtml
I Further suggest
that you read, “Crossing
the Rubicon”, by Michael Ruppert, which indicts Richard Cheney by detailing
his involvement in the NORAD diversions from intercepting the high-jacked
airplanes
This book is very
disturbing. One thing is for certain; the facts surrounding the multiple WTC
building collapses and Pentagon attack prove our government is not telling us
the whole truth. I shudder to think what this book seems to prove is true. Ask
your friends who are experts on the topics covered. I am now convinced that it
was not just an error of omission. It seems clear to me that someone executed a
master of deception’s plan and killed thousands of innocent people. Osama and
Bush may just be patsies [people to take the blame].
I would love to have
your view once you have read it. If you are an engineer, download our simple
spreadsheet, fill in the blanks and expand it to prove or disprove
your/anyone’s theory. TowerHeatMass.xls $10,000 prize to any full blown proof of
how the Towers Collapsed. You must answer everything in the spreadsheet and
expand it to cover all the details an engineer would know to consider.
I am also appalled by
the media. We commissioned a Zogby Poll that reported that 66% of New Yorkers wanted the
9/11 investigation re-opened. Moreover, it found that 49% thought that VIP's in
the government knew and did nothing. The New York Times did not think this was
"news fit to print". See
I will send at least one
free copy to any fire station, police precinct, judge, or politician.
It is my intention to
amass enough petition signatures and influence enough people to force the
reopening of the 911 Commission and a criminal investigation by the Attorney
General of NY into the mass murders that were perpetrated at the WTC. If anyone
would like to have a meeting with me, please call my associate, Debra Olson at
+1 (310) 573-1401 or email:debraolson@walden3.org.
We have launched a new web site www.reopen911.org Please go there to have more of your
questions answered and PLEASE sign our online petition. Do it now. Please.
Demand that your
government answer these questions that the 9/11 commission ignored and lied
about.
Sincerely,
James W Walter, Jr.
President
Walden Three, Inc.
jwalter@walden3.org
805 962-4942
P.S. Mr. Huftschmid
looks for conspiracies and asks intelligent questions. Secrecy begs questions.
Being right or wrong on one issue is not proof of right or wrong on another. He
unnecessarily complicates things with questions about the Kennedy assassination
on which I am not commenting, pro or con. Logically, who would be the least
afraid of ridicule and first to find a conspiracy? Remember that in the legend,
the wolf did finally come.
David vonKliest’s video, “In plane Site”, contains three mistakes and one very controversial section.
1. The maximum temperature of jet fuel (or any hydrocarbon in air) is 1800F not 3000F.
2. The jet, if it was flight 77, would have had only about 5700 gallons of fuel, not 8900 gallons, due to higher consumption at takeoff.
3. In the plume of smoke section, vonKleist incorrectly identifies the collapsing building situation. It is a clear mistake. The plume is occurring as the building behind collapses.
The controversial part is the alleged “pod”. Some say it is a shadow playing tricks.
However, the “flash” is real. The difference between a flash of light and a shadow is night and day. It occurs only on one section of the nose, not the entire nose. It does not occur as any other part of the plane hits the building. It occurs on both planes. It cannot be static since the plane is in a turn so that the top of the nose, not the bottom of the nose would have hit first. Since the flash is at the side of the bottom of the nose, it cannot be a static discharge. Furthermore, static discharge would not look like a puff of smoke. Moreover, it would be clearly visible like a lightning strike, not hidden in a puff.
Our first full page ad: http://www.walden3.org/Painful_Questions.pdf
Our new full page ad: http://www.walden3.org/Zogby2NYTfull.pdf
Our 9/11 event ad in the Village Voice:
http://www.walden3.org/vvad.pdf
Hear our Radio Ad: http://www.walden3.org/W3-BSV-IMP.mp3
See our TV Ad on the Pentagon:
http://www.walden3.org/spot2_pentagon2.mp4
See our TV Ad on the Building
7: http://www.walden3.org/spot1_building7.mp4
Call this number to order
the books and videos: 1 (800) 442-3977